<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS limit in Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:13:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilee Jessop</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-7564</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilee Jessop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 12:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/#comment-7564</guid>
		<description>It took me the better part of a year to figure out how to do &quot;proper&quot; table based layouts. It took me the better part of a month to figure out how to do pure css layouts. And that&#039;s even including work arounds for common bugs, like the Box Model Hack. So even people who use he excuses of &quot;it&#039;s easier&quot; and &quot;I&#039;m lazy&quot; are full of it. It seems to me that folks who are resistant to leaving behind old school table layouts are simply afraid to try something new. This is quite sad, because every web professional I know got into this field because it was something new. And most of us are tickled pink that thanks to emerging technologies and evolving standards like css, the field will remain new. Not to mention lower page weights and obviously a greater technical integrity which is important whatever product you are making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me the better part of a year to figure out how to do &#8220;proper&#8221; table based layouts. It took me the better part of a month to figure out how to do pure css layouts. And that&#8217;s even including work arounds for common bugs, like the Box Model Hack. So even people who use he excuses of &#8220;it&#8217;s easier&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m lazy&#8221; are full of it. It seems to me that folks who are resistant to leaving behind old school table layouts are simply afraid to try something new. This is quite sad, because every web professional I know got into this field because it was something new. And most of us are tickled pink that thanks to emerging technologies and evolving standards like css, the field will remain new. Not to mention lower page weights and obviously a greater technical integrity which is important whatever product you are making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raleigh Sandiford</title>
		<link>http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-7336</link>
		<dc:creator>Raleigh Sandiford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 02:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kamibu.com/2008/01/05/css-limit-in-internet-explorer/#comment-7336</guid>
		<description>you know your stuff, thank you mate,  excellent read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know your stuff, thank you mate,  excellent read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

